The quest for the “forgotten joint” in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led surgeons and researchers
to move beyond simple mechanical hinges toward designs that mimic natural kinematics. Central to
this evolution is the medial pivot (MP) concept. But does the design truly offer a clinical advantage,
or is it merely an elegant theory?
The Kinematic Argument
In a healthy, native knee, the medial femoral condyle remains relatively stationary during flexion,
acting as a stable ball-and-socket, while the lateral condyle translates posteriorly. This “medial pivot”
mechanism is essential for maximizing range of motion and quadriceps efficiency.1
Traditional TKA designs, such as posterior-stabilized (PS) or cruciate-retaining (CR) models, often
feature symmetrical geometries. These can lead to “paradoxical anterior slide,” where the femur
slides forward during flexion, causing a sensation of instability.2 The medial pivot design addresses
this by using a highly congruent medial insert to provide a fixed rotation point, effectively restoring
more natural movement and improving sagittal-plane stability.1,2
Clinical Performance and Patient Preference
The logic of the MP design is increasingly validated by patient-reported outcomes. Systematic
reviews and meta-analyses have shown that MP designs result in significantly improved Forgotten
Joint Scores (FJS) and range of motion when compared to traditional cruciate-retaining or posteriorstabilized designs.3,4 Patients frequently report that MP knees feel more “natural” and stable during
demanding tasks, such as stair climbing or rising from a chair.5
Furthermore, long-term survivorship data is robust. Studies tracking MP cohorts over 11 to 15 years
show cumulative success rates exceeding 97% for revision for any reason.5 This suggests that the
increased congruency of the medial compartment does not compromise implant longevity, providing
a reliable solution for end-stage osteoarthritis.5
Conclusão
The medial pivot concept makes sense because it prioritizes kinematic fidelity. While traditional
designs are successful at pain relief, the MP design addresses the functional nuance viz. stability,
proprioception, and natural “feel” that modern, active patients demand. By stabilizing the medial
side and allowing the lateral side to move freely, it successfully bridges the gap between mechanical
replacement and biological restoration.
Bibliography
- Samad A, Marwan YA, Al-Sayer AY, et al. Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty. Cureus.2025;17(10):e12547263.
- Puttock D, Pradhan A, et al. Medial pivot designs result in improved patient reportedoutcome measures and range of motion when compared to cruciate retaining total knee
replacements: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and
Trauma. 2026;12885310.
- Pattnaik M, et al. Comparative study of outcomes with total knee arthroplasty: medial pivotprosthesis vs posterior stabilized implant. Prospective randomized control. Journal of
Orthopaedics. 2025;11889026.
- Risitano S, Cacciola G, Capella M, Bosco F, Giustra F, Fusini F, Indelli PF, Massé A, Sabatini L.Comparison between gaits after a medial pivot and posterior stabilized primary total knee
arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Arthroplasty. 2023 Mar 17;5(1):15. doi:
10.1186/s42836-023-00165-8. PMID: 36927464; PMCID: PMC10022170
- Karachalios T, Varitimidis S, Bargiotas K, Hantes M, Roidis N, Malizos KN. An 11- to 15-yearclinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty: pivot knee
arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1050-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.36208.
PMID: 27482016.
Deixe um comentário